Abstract

Tauopathies constitute a broad group of clinically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and Pick’s disease, characterized by abnormal metabolism, misfolding, and intracellular aggregation of the microtubule-associated protein tau. These diseases are defined by disruptions in alternative splicing of the tau protein, toxic post-translational modifications such as hyperphosphorylation and acetylation, and the “prion-like” spread of pathological tau seeds across anatomically connected regions. Recent cryogenic electron microscopy studies have demonstrated that each tauopathy has a unique filament-folding structure, elucidating the molecular basis of phenotypic variation among diseases. The aim of this review is to provide a holistic perspective by synthesizing recent developments in the molecular and genetic architecture of tauopathies, particularly newly discovered genetic risk loci and cellular proteostasis mechanisms. In this context, detailing the process from the physiological functions of the tau protein to its pathological transformation aims to analytically evaluate the diagnostic value of fluid biomarkers and current data on next-generation clinical-stage therapeutic strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies and antisense oligonucleotides.

Cite this article as: Demir Ünal E, Çomoğlu SS. The molecular and genetic view of tauopathies: From structural polymorphism to systemic neurodegeneration. Parkinson Hast Harek Boz Derg 2026;29(2):33-45. doi: 10.5606/ phhb.dergisi.2026.66.

E.D.U., S.S.Ç.: Concept and design, critical review; S.S.Ç.: Supervision, data collection and processing, analysis and interpretation, literature search; E.D.U.: Writing.

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

AI Disclosure
The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were not used, or were used solely for language editing, and had no role in data analysis, interpretation, or the formulation of conclusions. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors further confirm that AI tools were not used to generate, fabricate, or ‘hallucinate’ references, and that all references have been carefully verified for accuracy.